Systematic approach to evaluating the trustworthiness of any innovation is key to achieving the goals in relation to patient care and satisfaction. Innovation practitioners at HDOs face persistent issues in accumulating the required knowledge around innovation evaluation. The absence of an evaluation framework can lead to implementation of technologies that make fraudulent claims. This can increase the likelihood of risks and adverse patient outcomes that can be fatal.
An evidence-based, peer-reviews-driven approach could be one such framework to evaluate the trustworthiness of innovations to drive the diffusion without jeopardizing the overall outcome. Significant research questions to evaluate the credibility of any innovation, will help to make a distinction between fraudulent and genuine ones based on whether
(a) The research went through a peer-review approval
(b) Lacks evidence and provides biased opinions
OR, (c) Whether the research just considered correlation and lacks causal explanation
Know anyone building innovative solutions that belong in this 'Innovation Evidence Trustworthiness'?
The assurance cookie is found and is being filtered in Google Analytics.
These cookies are used to collect information about how you interact
with our website and allow us to remember you. We use this
information in order to improve and customize your browsing
experience, and for analytics and metrics about our visitors both on
this website and other media. To find out more about the cookies we
use, see our